Group A — Intent Data & AI Governance · CLO GOAT Courts V11

← Courts Hub CLO Synthesis Harvey Ruth Cochran Alan Oliver

Cases — Group A

Case	Matter	Lead GOAT	Status
CASE-001	Intent Routing + Data SovereigntyDoes the silo owner control all routing? No external hops without CLO gate?	HARVEYALAN	⏳ PRELIM queued
CASE-002	AI-Generated Evidence AdmissibilityCan AI-generated outputs be admitted as evidence? What authentication standards apply?	COCHRANOLIVER	⏳ PRELIM queued
CASE-003	Intent Data OwnershipWho owns a user's intent? Is derived intent data personal data under PIPEDA/GDPR?	RUTHERIN	⏳ PRELIM queued
CASE-004	Consent-First Architecture as Legal StandardCan EOSE's consent-first architecture become the recognised legal standard for AI data handling?	RUTHSANDRA	⏳ PRELIM queued
CASE-005	LLM Output as Intellectual PropertyDo our 500+ Novel Patterns qualify as IP? What protection applies? Who owns AI-assisted inventions?	HARVEYTHURGOOD	⏳ PRELIM queued

GOAT Views — Select a Counsel

Each GOAT approaches Group A from their specialty domain. Click any GOAT to enter their 3-courts view — 2-pager, Prelim Brief (Stage 1), First Court (Stage 2), Review Court (Stage 3).

IP deals · M&A · patent vs trade secret · who controls the asset

Constitutional · sovereignty doctrine · rights as floor · DESEOF frame

Narrative · trial strategy · the story that wins in court and in rooms

Civil rights · equity · equal access · public interest doctrine

Formal logic · evidence standards · proof chains · sorry-map timestamps

Common law · precedent · what the established floor already says

Moral clarity · conscience · the hard right when it's expensive

Balance · consensus · the pragmatic path that holds up

Sovereignty · dignity · the long arc · what we are building for

Adversarial testing · cross-examination · finding the crack before they do

People-first · plain language · the human cost · access over process

Feminist jurisprudence · structural critique · who the system was not built for